Nach den COP26-Nachrichten, dass sich etwa 46 Länder, fünf subnationale und 26 Organisationen ganz oder teilweise der Initiative Global Coal to Clean Power Transition verpflichtet haben

(WK-intern) – Effuah Alleyne, Senior Oil & Gas Analyst bei GlobalData, einem führenden Daten- und Analyseunternehmen, äußert sich zu der Initiative:

„Obwohl die Initiative kritische CO2-Emissionsrichtlinien anspricht, hat das spürbare Fehlen und Fehlen von Dringlichkeit und Unterstützung durch große Kohlekraftwerke zu einem weniger als vielversprechenden Start geführt.

„Die Ziele betreffen die Skalierung sauberer Stromerzeugung, Energieeffizienz, Technologien und Richtlinien, die den Übergang bis in die 2030er/2040er Jahre unterstützen, die Einstellung neuer Genehmigungen und direkter staatlicher Unterstützung für diese Projekte sowie die Stärkung unterstützender nationaler und internationaler Rahmenbedingungen.

„Große Kohleproduzenten – darunter China, Indien, die USA und Japan – haben das Abkommen nicht unterzeichnet. Im Jahr 2020 machten diese Länder zusammen über 75 % der kumulierten Kohlekapazität weltweit aus, wobei China allein für etwa 50 % verantwortlich war. Vietnam, Indonesien und G7-Mitglieder wie Kanada, Deutschland, Italien und das Vereinigte Königreich gehören zwar zu denen, die ihre Unterstützung zugesagt haben, aber sie sind nur ein kleiner Treiber für signifikante Veränderungen.“

Global Coal to Clean Power Transition initiative missing key support, says GlobalData

Following the COP26 news that approximately 46 countries, five subnational and 26 organizations pledged in total or in part to the Global Coal to Clean Power Transition initiative;

Effuah Alleyne, Senior Oil & Gas Analyst at GlobalData, a leading data and analytics company, offers her view on the initiative:

“Though the initiative addresses critical carbon emission directives, the noticeable absence and lack of urgency and support of major coal power generation producers has resulted in a less than auspicious start.

“The goals address scaling clean power generation, energy efficiencies, technologies and policies that support the transition by the 2030s/2040s, ceasing new permits and direct government support for those projects as well as strengthening supportive domestic and international frameworks.

“Major coal producers – including China, India, the US and Japan – have not signed the agreement. In 2020, these countries collectively accounted for over 75% of the cumulative coal capacity globally, with China alone responsible for roughly 50%. While Vietnam, Indonesia and G7 members such as Canada, Germany, Italy and the UK are among those that pledged support, they represent a minor driver for significant change.”

Alleyne continues: “China’s coal sector is miles ahead of other key countries and is forecast to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 1.75% between 2020 and 2030. India’s, too, will grow at a CAGR of 1.78% during the same period. The US is reducing, but not to a significant degree. Countries such as China and India tout affordability of coal and the stability of renewable options as reasons for continued use as the social and environmental costs mount, while the US needs to overcome the political hurdle that stems from coal-related employment.

“Additionally, carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology, which provides a solution for carbon dioxide emissions, has high capital cost from industrial units and is becoming a major deterrent for deploying CCS. The Global Coal to Clean Power Transition initiative will have to persevere through multiple obstacles and aggressive action needs to be taken if we are to see a noteworthy change by 2030.”

About GlobalData

4,000 of the world’s largest companies, including over 70% of FTSE 100 and 60% of Fortune 100 companies, make more timely and better business decisions thanks to GlobalData’s unique data, expert analysis and innovative solutions, all in one platform. GlobalData’s mission is to help our clients decode the future to be more successful and innovative across a range of industries, including the healthcare, consumer, retail, financial, technology and professional services sectors.

PR: GlobalData

PB: Kohleverbrauch im Ländervergleich / © GlobalData